The New York Times (NYT) has recently filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The lawsuit alleges that these companies have used NYT’s content without permission to train their AI models. This lawsuit has sparked a significant debate in the tech industry, raising important questions about copyright, fair use, and the rights of authors in the context of AI and machine learning.
We engaged in a discussion with ChatGPT about the suit, and asked how it would the suit. Here is the line of defense suggested by ChatGPT.
Read also: History of Artificial Intelligence: Can Machines Think?
The Defense
In response to the lawsuit, a potential defense could emphasize that AI models like GPT-3 do not have the ability to access or retrieve information from specific documents, databases, or sources. Instead, they generate responses based on patterns they have learned, not by copying and pasting from their training data. This argument could potentially challenge the basis of the lawsuit, as it suggests that the AI models are not directly using the copyrighted content, but rather learning from it in a more abstract manner.
Decision Factors
The decision to settle or fight a lawsuit depends on a variety of factors. These include the cost of litigation, the risk of losing the case, the time it would take to resolve the issue, the potential publicity (positive or negative) that could result from the lawsuit, and the impact on future relations between the parties involved.
Authors Joining the Lawsuit
The lawsuit has attracted attention from a group of authors, including Pulitzer Prize winners Stacy Schiff and Kai Bird, as well as other renowned authors like George R.R. Martin and John Grisham. These authors have joined the lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, indicating that the issue extends beyond just the NYT and involves the broader author community.
Open Source Language Models
As of the latest available information, open source language models and groups are not facing any specific lawsuits related to the infringement issues of their language models. This could be due to the transparency and accessibility of open source models, which allow for greater scrutiny and accountability.
Open Source vs Proprietary Models
Open source AI models and proprietary models like OpenAI’s GPT-3 face different types of scrutiny due to their differing approaches to accessibility and transparency. While open source models are freely available for anyone to inspect and modify, proprietary models are often kept secret, making it difficult to determine exactly how they work.
The Core Issue
The lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI and Microsoft primarily revolves around allegations of copyright infringement. However, it also raises a broader question: Is the issue really about the data used to train the models, or is it about the closed nature of the source code? This question is likely to be a key point of contention as the lawsuit progresses.
Read also: How Is Artificial Intelligence Re-Shaping the World
Potential Counterarguments by NYT Lawyers
Against the Defense Argument
The lawyers for The New York Times (NYT) might argue that even if AI models like GPT-3 do not directly access or retrieve information from specific documents, databases, or sources, they still use the patterns learned from the copyrighted content. This, they could argue, constitutes a form of indirect copying and thus still infringes on the copyright.
On Decision Factors
While it’s true that the decision to settle or fight a lawsuit depends on a variety of factors, the NYT lawyers might argue that the principle of the matter is more important. They could stress that it’s about protecting the rights of authors and content creators, and not just about the cost, risk, time, publicity, and future relations.
Authors Joining the Lawsuit
The fact that renowned authors have joined the lawsuit could be used by the NYT lawyers to emphasize the gravity of the issue. They could argue that this isn’t just about one organization’s content, but about the rights of authors and content creators in general.
Open Source Language Models
The NYT lawyers might argue that the lack of lawsuits against open source language models doesn’t necessarily mean that these models are free from copyright issues. They could point out that it might simply be a case of the issues not having been brought to light yet.
Open Source vs Proprietary Models
In response to the argument about the differing scrutiny faced by open source and proprietary models, the NYT lawyers could argue that the issue isn’t about the level of scrutiny, but about the use of copyrighted content without permission, regardless of whether the model is open source or proprietary.
The Core Issue
Finally, the NYT lawyers might argue that the core issue is indeed about the data used to train the models. They could stress that the use of copyrighted content without permission is a clear infringement, regardless of whether the source code is open or closed. They might also argue that the closed nature of the source code makes it difficult to verify the claims made by OpenAI and Microsoft about how their models work.